From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 13 13:15:33 2002
Return-Path: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 13 Mar 2002 21:15:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 53620 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 21:15:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2002 21:15:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (216.231.54.78)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 21:15:32 -0000
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
  id 16lG6f-00064m-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:16:21 -0800
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:16:21 -0800
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] LogFest 2001: How are we doing?
Message-ID: <20020313211621.GR29405@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <20020313010715.GE25495@digitalkingdom.org> <Pine.NEB.4.44.0203131220260.20282-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0203131220260.20282-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819
X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:28:35PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> > > Robin Powell will also be setting up a mailing list for voting
> > > members of LLG who are online, separate from other lists, so that
> > > members can communicate on organizational issues without having to
> > > have me as a bottleneck.
> >
> > Done, it didn't get much use.
> 
> 
> 
> .oi tu'a la lojban. cu cinri piso'a lei jbogri ze'i lo djedi beli 2.5
> fi'o terdikni lo nanca

I read that as:

[complaint] lojbanic things interest most of the mass of lojbanists for
about 2 and a half days every year.

Meaning, I assume, that most of the actual members of the LLG don't
actually do much; was that the intended meaning?

Assuming so:

.i mi na djuno ma poi cmima lei jbogri .iki'u mi na kakne le tugni

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/

