From rizen@ispwest.com Wed Mar 13 18:41:39 2002
Return-Path: <rizen@ispwest.com>
X-Sender: rizen@ispwest.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 02:41:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 95225 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 02:41:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 02:41:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ispwestemail.aceweb.net) (216.52.245.18)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 02:41:38 -0000
Received: from there (unverified [66.2.47.25]) by ispwestemail.aceweb.net
  (Vircom SMTPRS 1.2.221) with SMTP id <B0004911637@ispwestemail.aceweb.net> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>;
  Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:39:12 -0800
Message-ID: <B0004911637@ispwestemail.aceweb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban application in wearable computing
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:38:07 -0800
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
References: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0203121748450.2497-100000@reva.sixgirls.org> <B0004886862@ispwestemail.aceweb.net> <20020313180412.GJ29405@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020313180412.GJ29405@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ted Reed <rizen@ispwest.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=104181342
X-Yahoo-Profile: xrizen

On Wednesday, March 13 2002 10:04 am, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:38:07PM -0800, Ted Reed wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 12 2002 07:31 pm, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > >
> > > Uhhh, what?
> > >
> > > What resemblance do you see between lisp and lojban, exactly? At a
> > > first glance, I see a much stronger resemblance to Prolog.
> > >
> > > -Robin
> >
> > I have no experience with lisp or prolog. I'm told that scheme evolved
> > from lisp, so I just tend to lump them together. Sorry.
>
> scheme and lisp can be lumped together for purposes of this discussion.
>
> > Perhaps not lisp, but scheme tends to be organized around predicate
> > syntax and brackets to define things that are more than one word.
>
> Exactly. lojban doesn't use bracketing to define precedence, in
> general. It has a series of sentences which are syntactically
> unrelated.
>
> -Robin

But the presence of elidable terminators does strike a resemblance to using 
brackets for things that are more than one word. (Or parenthesis in the case 
of scheme.)

-- rizen

