From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Mar 14 15:02:26 2002
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 23:02:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 46349 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 23:02:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 23:02:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 23:02:23 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.90] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id ABFF2EF60062; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:02:23 -0500
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise.
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:02:24 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFMEHECGAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20020314225909.GV29405@digitalkingdom.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl

>Also, at that point we *could* move the mailing lists off of yahoo, and
>hence get rid of the advertising. But I have a feeling people don't
>want to do that, due to the public exposure (which I still say is
>nebulous, at best).

There's also some (mistaken, IMVHO) feeling that it is easier to use yahoo.
If this were demonstrably true, I would support the continued use of yahoo
just so as not to turn off non-geeks any more than we already do.