From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Mar 14 15:14:10 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 23:14:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 10466 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 23:14:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 23:14:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 23:14:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2ENE7u24798 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:14:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:14:06 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Craig wrote: > >Also, at that point we *could* move the mailing lists off of yahoo, and > >hence get rid of the advertising. But I have a feeling people don't > >want to do that, due to the public exposure (which I still say is > >nebulous, at best). > > There's also some (mistaken, IMVHO) feeling that it is easier to use yahoo. > If this were demonstrably true, I would support the continued use of yahoo > just so as not to turn off non-geeks any more than we already do. I wasn't aware there were politically correct alternatives that support the same feature set as does Yahoo groups. -- Somewhere in America there is an idiot whining about the fact that he has to learn to cursor around the menu system on his VCR, while an 8 year old is installing FreeBSD in his free time.