From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Mar 14 15:21:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 23:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18502 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 23:21:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 23:21:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 23:21:04 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.90] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A06012A0164; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:21:04 -0500 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise. Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:21:05 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> >Also, at that point we *could* move the mailing lists off of yahoo, and >> >hence get rid of the advertising. But I have a feeling people don't >> >want to do that, due to the public exposure (which I still say is >> >nebulous, at best). >> >> There's also some (mistaken, IMVHO) feeling that it is easier to use yahoo. >> If this were demonstrably true, I would support the continued use of yahoo >> just so as not to turn off non-geeks any more than we already do. >I wasn't aware there were politically correct alternatives that support >the same feature set as does Yahoo groups. A. What would make an alternative politically incorrect? B. When was the last time this group used a poll, or images, or any other feature other than mailing?