From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 14 15:25:06 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 23:25:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3686 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 23:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 23:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (216.231.54.78) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 23:25:05 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16lebZ-0000dl-00 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:25:53 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:25:53 -0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise. Message-ID: <20020314232553.GY29405@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819 X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:14:06PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Craig wrote: > > > >Also, at that point we *could* move the mailing lists off of yahoo, > > >and hence get rid of the advertising. But I have a feeling people > > >don't want to do that, due to the public exposure (which I still > > >say is nebulous, at best). > > > > There's also some (mistaken, IMVHO) feeling that it is easier to use > > yahoo. If this were demonstrably true, I would support the continued > > use of yahoo just so as not to turn off non-geeks any more than we > > already do. > > > > I wasn't aware there were politically correct alternatives that > support the same feature set as does Yahoo groups. What feature set are you looking for, exactly? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/