From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Mar 14 15:36:53 2002
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 14 Mar 2002 23:36:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 81690 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 23:36:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Mar 2002 23:36:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2002 23:36:52 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.90] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A4141D30005E; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:36:52 -0500
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise.
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:36:53 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFEEHGCGAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0203141823010.16578-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl

>> A. What would make an alternative politically incorrect?

>There is a school of thought that frowns upon anything that's commercial
>or corporate. Open Source is Good, Starbucks is Bad. You know what I'm
>talking about.

So, for example, people who attach ads to e-mail are bad, but service
provided for free and without ads by lojban.org is good, right?