From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Fri Mar 15 17:47:55 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7341 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2002 01:47:54 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.90.236]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020316014753.FODN7206.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:47:53 +0000 To: "Lojban List" Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise. Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:46:26 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200203150314.WAA18056@mail.reutershealth.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=77248971 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin John Cowan: > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > On the other hand, an alternative would almost surely include a sane reply > > policy for mailing list responses. > > The list has the policy it does because I'm the owner and I believe > that's the correct policy. As we have discussed before at wearisome > length. > > That said, I would not be opposed to leaving Yahoo. Just to remind people, lojban@jiscmail.ac.uk still exists, if the community wants to use it. Or it still existed last time I ehecked. It actually had a handful of subscribers, too, incredibly enough. Benefits: modicum of academic respectability fairly high public visibility professionally administered funded by UK state, so no ads As I say, it's there if it's wanted. If not, it's happily lying dormant. --And.