From gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch Mon Apr 08 11:55:45 2002
Return-Path: <gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch>
X-Sender: gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 8 Apr 2002 18:55:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 43862 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 18:55:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Apr 2002 18:55:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta1n.bluewin.ch) (195.186.1.210)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 18:55:44 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (213.3.35.135) by mta1n.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 6.0.040)
  id 3CAAC7690029EE71 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:55:43 +0200
Message-ID: <002101c1df37$c3196020$872303d5@oemcomputer>
To: "jboste" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: why is if ganai..gi?
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 21:58:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
From: "G. Dyke" <gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=81437350
X-Yahoo-Profile: gregvdyke

I'm still following this logic course.

we are still doing propositional logic, using the following axioms (among
others and using G for Gamma (hypothesis), - for not, | to separate
judgments from hypothesesesesesse ahemm and F for false):

G, A | F || G | -A J red absurd.
G,-A | F || G | A K red absurd.

The lecturer explained that "intuitive" logicians preferred not to accept
the K red absurd. as it is used to demonstrate:

|| G | A or -A exclusion of a third case

He also explained that sometimes this third case exclusion is taken as an
axiom (which is also rejected by many).

I seem to be getting cause and consequence of being "intuitive" mixed up
here, but anyways:

>From the refgramm, it seems to be accepted that a proposition is either true
or false.

But why force this into lojban:

A => B <=> -B or A

when this judgment can only be made given K red. or third case exclusion.

Greg, hoping he got it right and didn't make too much of a fool of himself.
--
http://www.myepfl.ch/gregory.dyke

.i lo'e to'e makcu cu djica lenu tolcumla morsi kei lo telda'a
.i lo'e je'a makcu cu go'i to'ebo le se go'i



