From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Apr 24 05:17:04 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 24 Apr 2002 12:17:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23886 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 12:17:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Apr 2002 12:17:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 12:17:04 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:48:56 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:17:01 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:16:23 +0100 To: rlpowell , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] where the mailing lists lie Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Robin: #> I note also that the discussion has tended to concern the pros and #> cons of leaving Yahoo, rather than the pros and cons of Lojban.org. We #> have not discussed, for instance, the relative pros and cons of having #> it in-house at Lojban.org or reviving the lojban@jiscmail.ac.uk list. # #I have no idea who ran the .ac.uk list, so I can't comment. It never got used, because Yahoo ameliorated their advertising policy. In brief, running it from Lojban.org gets us extra control over its operati= ons and a kind of small kudos [or 'kudo', for Americans] for being an=20 organization large and competent enough to run its own list. Running it from Jiscmail means no technical burden, less control, and whatever kudos there is to be had from being among overtly academically-oriented lists. --And.