Subject: Re: [lojban] cipja'o

From: Adam Raizen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:18:29 +0200

la pycyn. cusku di'e

> Oh, and {cipra} is not good for mathematical proofs -- it means "test" not
> "valid argument string" The {jarco} part is OK, but I would combine it with
> {jalge).

I don't think than 'result' has much to do with proofs and conclusions (despite
the word 'ja'o'). Maybe 'nibli porsi' (nibypoi)

mu'o mi'e .adam.