From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Apr 29 08:59:55 2002
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 29 Apr 2002 15:59:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 76220 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 15:59:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2002 15:59:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 15:59:53 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:20:39 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:46:08 +0100
Message-Id: <sccd78d0.090@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:44:52 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] What's the logic behind Lojban's sound system?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Craig:
#>The phonology of /'/ and /@/, where /@/ =3D buffer vowel is so stupid
#>-- so unlike anything in natlangs -- that it is simply indefensible.
#
#/@/ is NOT a buffer vowel, it is {y}.

It's important to remember that symbols enclosed by slash brackets //
are in principle arbitrary. There is a convention -- far from universally
observed -- of, for mnemonic purposes, choosing a symbol that
corresponds to the IPA symbol for the primary allophone of that
phoneme, but that is no more than one factor among others that
determine choices of phoneme symbolization. As you can see, in
choosing how to symbolize Lojban phonemes, I prefer to use not
IPA symbols but Lojban orthography, so writing the <y> vowel
as /y/. Add to that that when I wrote '@' I meant at-sign/escargot, not sch=
wa. The point is, that for the buffer vowel we need a symbol that does *not=
* correspond to anything in IPA, precisely because it has no canonical allo=
phone. (I myself use [y], but that is a personal act of desperation.)

--And.


