From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Wed May 01 09:23:08 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_1); 1 May 2002 16:23:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 43163 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 16:23:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 May 2002 16:23:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 May 2002 16:23:07 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id g41GN7J18073 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 10:23:07 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:23:06 -0600 (MDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cipja'o In-Reply-To: <02050109565706.02045@neofelis> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=20706630 X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Wed, 1 May 2002, Pierre Abbat wrote: > I meant "transcendental". What's the right word? For what its worth, a transcendental function is one which cannot be expressed in algebraic terms. so: NAhE + "algebraic" + fancu is what you're looking for. Or, possibly fanc + fu'ivla-ization("transcendental") "beyond calculation" is sort of incorrect. for instance, the natural log of 1 is 0. (yet, the natural log is transcendental. though i'm not sure if this is a place where the definition of transcendental breaks down.) - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose