Subject: Re: [lojban] cipja'o

From: Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:23:06 -0600 (MDT)

On Wed, 1 May 2002, Pierre Abbat wrote:

> I meant "transcendental". What's the right word?

For what its worth, a transcendental function is one which cannot be
expressed in algebraic terms.

so:

NAhE + "algebraic" + fancu

is what you're looking for.

Or, possibly fanc + fu'ivla-ization("transcendental")

"beyond calculation" is sort of incorrect. for instance, the natural log
of 1 is 0. (yet, the natural log is transcendental. though i'm not sure if
this is a place where the definition of transcendental breaks down.)

- Jay Kominek <[email-masked]>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose