From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 07 17:50:02 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 8 May 2002 00:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 3144 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 00:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 May 2002 00:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (66.92.190.121) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 May 2002 00:50:02 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 175FfG-0004qF-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 17:50:42 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:50:42 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: ka'enai (was Re: [lojban] cmavo compounds) Message-ID: <20020508005042.GU1993@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <20020425060432.GB3433@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020425060432.GB3433@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819 X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:04:32AM -0400, Rob Speer wrote: > The arbitrarily ungrammatical "ka'enai" is 19th, having been used 34 > times, many of which were in written text and not IRC. This shows > quite clearly, I think, that on this point the grammar is out of date > with the language. I've been wondering: Is the grammar capable of handling ka'enai and such without breaking its LR(1)-ness? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/