From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu May 09 18:08:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 10 May 2002 01:08:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 72891 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 01:08:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2002 01:08:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 01:08:05 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.182] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AD7610BF0186; Thu, 09 May 2002 21:08:06 -0400 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Memorization techniques for cmavo Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:08:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <20020510004342.GR4164@digitalkingdom.org> Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >In light of the new cmavo frequency list (Thank you Rob!) I'm thinking >about re-doing my SuperMemo flashcards (great program, btw; at least the >Palm version is). >So, I would like rodo's opinion on something: should I memorize the >basic cmavo compounds that are in the cmavo list, or not? In >particular, for attitudinals and su'itcita. >In other words, should I memorize .ie and .iecu'i and .ienai, or just >.ie? Should I memorize mu'u and semu'u and temu'u, or just mu'u? I memorize (or try to) all forms of the modals, but I only memorize the basic form of the attitudinals (And you've probably seen that I can comfortably use the SAI and NAI after them...)