From phma@webjockey.net Tue May 14 22:20:17 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 15 May 2002 05:20:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 96602 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 05:20:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2002 05:20:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 05:20:16 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 97F823C477; Wed, 15 May 2002 01:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: zgamuvjga Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 01:20:13 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02051501201300.02013@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 I made this word up for "parallax" with the following place structure: x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves to x4 from x5 Someone proposed the following place structure, if I understand the comment right: x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves along path x4 Which is better? phma