From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Thu May 16 07:53:44 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 16 May 2002 14:53:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 11033 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 14:53:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 May 2002 14:53:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2002 14:53:42 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id g4GErgb12583 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 08:53:42 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 08:53:42 -0600 (MDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] zgamuvjga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=20706630 X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ted Reed wrote: > On Tuesday 14 May 2002 22:20, you wrote: > > I made this word up for "parallax" with the following place structure: > > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves to x4 from x5 > > Someone proposed the following place structure, if I understand the com= ment > > right: > > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves along path x4 > > Which is better? > > I think knowing the whole path is more important than just the starting a= nd > ending points. Only the two observation points are relevent. The path does not have any affect on the total shift observed. (Nor can it.) - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose