From rizen@ispwest.com Thu May 16 09:48:09 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rizen@ispwest.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 16 May 2002 16:48:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 57521 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 16:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 May 2002 16:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ispwestemail.aceweb.net) (66.12.114.252) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2002 16:48:08 -0000 Received: from there (unverified [4.47.250.22]) by ispwestemail.aceweb.net (Vircom SMTPRS 1.3.227) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:43:18 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] zgamuvjga Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 09:46:18 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Ted Reed X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=104181342 X-Yahoo-Profile: xrizen On Thursday 16 May 2002 07:53, Jay Kominek wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ted Reed wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 May 2002 22:20, you wrote: > > > I made this word up for "parallax" with the following place structure: > > > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves to x4 from x5 > > > Someone proposed the following place structure, if I understand the > > > comment right: > > > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves along path x4 > > > Which is better? > > > > I think knowing the whole path is more important than just the starting > > and ending points. > > Only the two observation points are relevent. The path does not have any > affect on the total shift observed. (Nor can it.) What about a set of observation points? It's difficult to move between two points instantaneously. -- bancus