From sjhs@sdf.lonestar.org Tue Jun 04 12:47:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: sjhs@sdf.lonestar.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 4 Jun 2002 19:47:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 64164 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 19:47:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jun 2002 19:47:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdf.lonestar.org) (207.202.214.132) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2002 19:47:46 -0000 Received: (from sjhs@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g54JlXe29224 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:47:33 GMT Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:47:33 +0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o Message-ID: <20020604194733.A25895@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: <20020604004335.A1703@barsoom.net> <20020604101802.A12795@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020604101802.A12795@allusion.net>; from fracture@allusion.net on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:18:02AM -0500 From: "Shane J. H. Sniffen" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=113583692 On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:18:02AM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: > 'le selma'o be zo ui', or 'ro lo cmavo be la'e zo ui' seem nicer than > reverting to using names or descriptions to me. Why wouldn't "la'o ly. UI .ly" work best in this case? That's basically what "la'e zo ui" is, except what your quoting is not actually the lojban word ".ui" but the concept designated by the name "UI".