From phma@webjockey.net Wed Jun 05 14:54:28 2002
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 5 Jun 2002 21:54:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 59915 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 21:54:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Jun 2002 21:54:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 21:54:28 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id C9C173C480; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:54:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:54:19 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <20020604004335.A1703@barsoom.net> <20020604101802.A12795@allusion.net> <20020604194733.A25895@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <20020604194733.A25895@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0206051754190S.02104@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Tuesday 04 June 2002 15:47, Shane J. H. Sniffen wrote:
> Why wouldn't "la'o ly. UI .ly" work best in this case? That's
> basically what "la'e zo ui" is, except what your quoting is not
> actually the lojban word ".ui" but the concept designated by the name
> "UI".

I think it should be "la me zo ui". "la'e zo ui" means "what the word {ui} 
refers to", which is a state of happiness, not a selma'o. As to "la'o ly. UI 
.ly", I'm not sure how to pronounce it.

I think we should also have Lojban words for parts of speech, such as 
attitudinal, conjunction, and discursive, which don't coincide with the 
selma'o.

phma

