From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Fri Jun 07 06:23:36 2002
Return-Path: <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
X-Sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 15035 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jun 2002 13:23:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw5.gedas.de) (139.1.44.13)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2002 13:23:35 -0000
Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06948
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49])
  by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06941;
  Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
  id <M3SMW919>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:32 +0200
Message-ID: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DCD67@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg>
To: "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com,
  "Newton, Philip"
  <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
Subject: Re: [lojban] How many places for lujvo?
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:23:27 +0200 
Return-Receipt-To: "Newton, Philip" <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "Newton, Philip" <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112
X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton

John Cowan wrote:
> Newton, Philip scripsit:
> > 
> > And is there any mechanism analogous to the fa,fe,fi,fo,fu 
> > mechanism to get at places beyond the fifth?
> 
> "faxixa", "faxire", "faxici", etc.

Was that intended to be "faxixa, faxize, faxibi" or "faxipa, faxire,
faxici", or was it intentionally a mixture?

> You can use any other FA with the same meaning if you like.

So if I want to fill, say, 2 and 3 and 7 I might use fe and fi and foxize?

> New gismu are not now being defined. If one were to be added, I doubt
> that it would have more than five places, but there is no principled
> restriction.

OK, thanks.

fe'omi'e filip.
-- 
Philip Newton <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

