From pycyn@aol.com Fri Jun 07 07:59:51 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 7 Jun 2002 14:59:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 47573 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2002 14:59:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jun 2002 14:59:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m08.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.163)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2002 14:59:50 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.182.965ce24 (4585)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:59:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <182.965ce24.2a32245d@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:59:41 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] How many places for lujvo?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_182.965ce24.2a32245d_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_182.965ce24.2a32245d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 6/7/2002 9:45:17 AM Central Daylight Time, 
Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de writes:


> 
> Hm... is it coincidence that the vowels in the digits 1 to 9 are .a .e .i 
> .o
> .u .a .e .i .o? I suppose not. (That would imply that 0 should be .u,
> though...)
> 

Yes, it is not coincidence and yes {no} should have a /u/, but other factors 
overrode that thought.

--part1_182.965ce24.2a32245d_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 6/7/2002 9:45:17 AM Central Daylight Time, Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><BR>
Hm... is it coincidence that the vowels in the digits 1 to 9 are .a .e .i .o<BR>
.u .a .e .i .o? I suppose not. (That would imply that 0 should be .u,<BR>
though...)<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Yes, it is not coincidence and yes {no} should have a /u/, but other factors overrode that thought.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_182.965ce24.2a32245d_boundary--

