From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Fri Jun 07 10:31:24 2002
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 7 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 965 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n28.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.84)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.188] by n28.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 17:31:24 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: More Laudz
Message-ID: <adqqlc+q31b@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <157.efcfe2f.2a321c57@aol.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1627
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "aolung" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=37407270
X-Yahoo-Profile: aolung

--- In lojban@y..., pycyn@a... wrote:
> 'lonu zasti ce lonu na zasti cu finsi'u
> .i loka nandu ce loka frili cu riksi'u
> .i loka clani ce loka tordu cu mresi'u
> .i loka galtu ce loka dizlu cu bapsi'u
> .i lo voksa joi lo sance cu saxsi'u
> .i caku lo purci lo bavli cu katyje'i'

Sein und Nichtsein entspringen einander=20
Schwer und Leicht bedingen einander=20
Lang und Kurz vermessen einander=20
Hoch und Tief erzwingen einander.=20
Die Stimme f=FCgt sich dem Ton im Chor=20
Und ein Danach folgt dem Zuvor .=20

(Prof. G.Debon)

Don't have the original at hand, but I can say that the translation
was
also inspired by this German version (G.D. is a sinologist with high
reputation on the field of poetry).

> 6. {balvi} (all the rest is esthetic choices). Having both {kalte}
and=20
> {jersi} seems like overkill, though the image is nice.

If I remember right, this was about the Chinese expression (chase?).
{jersi} seemed important (-> follow), {kalte} to build a
poetic/rhyming=20
lujvo.=20

> Why is the mutuality missing here (or is {je'i} a misprint for
{si'u})?=20=20
> Surely the intention is that the future pursues the past as well

Don't think so: Future is eaten up by the past not viceversa!=20

> What is the point of the=20
> {caku}, which breaks the pattern? All of these are presumably
eternal facts=20
> (indeed, one variant reading has just that claim about the list).

{caku} is the narrow (virtual) line where {purci} reaches {balvi} -
devouring/incorporating it live ;-( Excuse, this being my own idea!
Maybe the whole is circular in kind of a helix, but not mutual in
direction.

mi'e .aulun.