From jkominek-yahoo@miranda.org Sat Jun 08 19:15:58 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jkominek@miranda.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 9 Jun 2002 02:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28635 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 02:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jun 2002 02:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO miranda.org) (209.58.150.153) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 02:15:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by uid 534); 9 Jun 2002 02:15:56 -0000 Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 20:15:56 -0600 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] gait Message-ID: <20020608201556.A19503@miranda.org> References: <0206082203181V.02104@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <0206082203181V.02104@neofelis>; from phma@webjockey.net on Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:03:18PM -0400 X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek From: Jay F Kominek X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=115080544 X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:03:18PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Which is better for "gait", {tapmo'a} or {zumdzu}? Or is each better in a > different context? tadji, pruce, and pu'u come to mind. You're referring to "a person's manner of walking", correct? - Jay Kominek