From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Jun 08 19:36:39 2002
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 9 Jun 2002 02:36:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 67412 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 02:36:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jun 2002 02:36:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao04.cox.net) (68.1.17.241)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 02:36:39 -0000
Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.213]) by lakemtao04.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
  id <20020609023639.ZOTV4949.lakemtao04.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:36:39 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020608223340.00aae340@digitalkingdom.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 22:34:40 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] gait
In-Reply-To: <20020608201556.A19503@miranda.org>
References: <0206082203181V.02104@neofelis>
  <0206082203181V.02104@neofelis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab

At 08:15 PM 6/8/02 -0600, Jay F Kominek wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:03:18PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > Which is better for "gait", {tapmo'a} or {zumdzu}? Or is each better in a
> > different context?
>
>tadji, pruce, and pu'u come to mind.
>
>You're referring to "a person's manner of walking", correct?

For manner of running, it is even easier : ve bajra

lojbab