From pycyn@aol.com Sat Jun 08 20:02:17 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 9 Jun 2002 03:02:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 88447 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 03:02:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jun 2002 03:02:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d03.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.35) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 03:02:17 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.97.28bda1a3 (3924) for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:02:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <97.28bda1a3.2a341f34@aol.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:02:12 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] gait To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_97.28bda1a3.2a341f34_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_97.28bda1a3.2a341f34_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/8/2002 9:37:03 PM Central Daylight Time, lojbab@lojban.org writes: > At 08:15 PM 6/8/02 -0600, Jay F Kominek wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:03:18PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > Which is better for "gait", {tapmo'a} or {zumdzu}? Or is each better in > a > > > different context? > > > >tadji, pruce, and pu'u come to mind. > > > >You're referring to "a person's manner of walking", correct? > > For manner of running, it is even easier : ve bajra > But the various runnings are also gaits and cadzu had better cover them all. I'd go with {dzumo'a} but I am not sure that {morna} is up to the complexities of equine gait as patiently explained to me by my then six year old or even the O;ympic rules on the difference among jogging, running, sprinting, and walking. Order of legs, parts of foot (or whatever) to touch first (and what second, for that matter). And that does not even take into account unsteady gaits, limps of various sorts (sometimes medically significant), and so on. the structures in {morna3} are liable to take up a page, until codified. --part1_97.28bda1a3.2a341f34_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 6/8/2002 9:37:03 PM Central Daylight Time, lojbab@lojban.org writes:


At 08:15 PM 6/8/02 -0600, Jay F Kominek wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:03:18PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > Which is better for "gait", {tapmo'a} or {zumdzu}? Or is each better in a
> > different context?
>
>tadji, pruce, and pu'u come to mind.
>
>You're referring to "a person's manner of walking", correct?

For manner of running, it is even easier : ve bajra


But the various runnings are also gaits and cadzu had better cover them all.  I'd go with {dzumo'a} but I am not sure that {morna} is up to the complexities of equine gait as patiently explained to me by my then six year old  or even the O;ympic rules on the difference among jogging, running, sprinting, and walking. Order of legs, parts of foot (or whatever) to touch first (and what second, for that matter).  And that does not even take into account unsteady gaits, limps of various sorts (sometimes medically significant), and so on.  the structures in {morna3} are liable to take up a page, until codified. --part1_97.28bda1a3.2a341f34_boundary--