From eks2@york.ac.uk Fri Jun 14 06:31:17 2002
Return-Path: <eks2@york.ac.uk>
X-Sender: eks2@york.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 14 Jun 2002 13:31:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 82651 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2002 13:31:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2002 13:31:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.76)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2002 13:31:16 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.174] by n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jun 2002 13:31:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:31:13 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Correct terminator(s)?
Message-ID: <aecr71+is4u@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <aecqej+f9ah@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1461
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
From: "sklyanin" <eks2@york.ac.uk>
X-Originating-IP: 144.32.128.133
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=71790832
X-Yahoo-Profile: sklyanin

coi filip.

do cusku di'e

> Hi, I have a question.
> 
[...]
> but if I want to say it as "I described my reading of the book to 
> you", then the "obvious" translation,
> 
> mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta do
> 
> is incorrect because then the "do" is attached to the "tcidu" and 
not 
> to the "skicu", as desired (and I guess the result means something 
> like "I described how I read from the book which is written on 
you"). 
> So I need at least one terminator in there somewhere. However, I'm
> not sure which ones. My first attempt was "ku", but
> 
> mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta ku do
> 
> only terminates "le cukta" as argument to "tcidu" and still attaches 
> "do" to "tcidu". However, all of the following appear to work (at 
> least according to jbofi'e):
> 
> mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta ku ku do
> .i mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta kei do
> .i mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta kei ku do
> .i mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta ku kei do
> 
> I presume they can't all be correct -- or can they? If they are, is 
> there a difference? Which would be the preferred way? If none is 
> correct, what would be the correct way to say it?
> 
Grammatically they all are correct - they do exactly the same job,
so the question is merely of "good style". For a computer all the 
variants are the same. For a human being though the variant 

mi skicu lenu mi tcidu le cukta kei do

seems to be the most digestible.

co'o mi'e .evgenis.