From jewel@pixie.co.za Tue Jun 18 11:05:11 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jewel@pixie.co.za X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 18 Jun 2002 18:05:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 85684 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 18:05:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2002 18:05:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lenny.elandtech.com) (212.17.60.214) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2002 18:05:08 -0000 Received: from [192.168.100.211] (helo=bapli ident=mail) by lenny.elandtech.com with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17KNBL-0008SS-00; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:54:19 +0000 Received: from jleuner by bapli with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17KNI1-0000j4-00; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:01:13 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:01:13 +0100 To: Craig Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] So you think you're logical? Message-ID: <20020618180113.GU19942@bapli> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: John Leuner From: John Leuner X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=41106253 X-Yahoo-Profile: jewel2011 > >All fans of ganai...gi... should perform this test > >(takes only a few minutes): > > As a fan of ganai...gi... in most cases (and proponent of bai), I should > point out that there are times in English when we say 'if' but mean either > 'segu...gi...' or 'go...gi...', so the test is imperfect as a result of > ambiguities in English. However, the particular questions on the test do all > assume a ganai...gi... if. > > I got three of the four right, and one was wrong only because I misclicked. > > --la kreig.daniyl. > > '.i do cu vanci le ba panje xusra > .i denci gunma le se gidva' > > pygypy gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74 (laldo), 0x22C68020 (citno) ki'a laldo mi'e jemna