From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Jul 03 09:57:54 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 3 Jul 2002 16:57:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 16780 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2002 16:57:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jul 2002 16:57:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jul 2002 16:57:54 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17PnRz-00027u-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:57:55 -0700
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17PnRz-00027S-00
  for lojban-out@digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:57:55 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17PZfn-0000w9-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:15:15 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:15:12 z (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17PZfk-0000w0-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:15:12 -0700
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g632JuC66359
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 21:19:56 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 21:19:56 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: pro-sumti question
Message-ID: <20020702211956.A66224@allusion.net>
References: <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <200207021852.58193.rizen@surreality.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200207021852.58193.rizen@surreality.us>; from rizen@surreality.us on Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 06:52:49PM -0700
X-archive-position: 93
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 
Resent-From: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 09:57:54 -0700
Resent-To: Lojban Mirror outgoing <lojban-out@digitalkingdom.org>
Resent-Message-Id: <E17PnRz-00027S-00@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 06:52:49PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On 2002.07.02 18:23, you wrote:
> > If I say
> >
> > le gerku cu jersi le mlatu
> > <they> cu tatpi binxo
> >
> > What can I use for <they>? I don't think "rera" or "reri" is quite
> > right... "ri .e ra" is a little bit lame, but the only thing I can
> > think of. Are there cmavo for this that I dunno about?
>=20
> .i le gerku goi ko'a cu jersi le mlatu .i ko'a cu tatpi binxo

I think you might've misunderstood. I needed to refer to _both_
the gerku and the mlatu. Your example says that the gerku got
tired.

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0iX0wACgkQDrrilS51AZ/rEwCffErBXXaKXdPi4DnZjkHEyLhD
nJMAmQGo7HjnsZMl+2uv0e1N/deUH0Ow
=xu43
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--

