From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jul 03 10:29:47 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 3 Jul 2002 17:29:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 92546 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2002 17:29:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jul 2002 17:29:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jul 2002 17:29:47 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17Pnwq-0002E6-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:29:48 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17Pnwn-0002Dp-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:29:46 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:29:43 z (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17Pnwk-0002Dg-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:29:42 -0700
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:29:42 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Message-ID: <20020703172941.GR2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <0207031322060D.02128@neofelis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0207031322060D.02128@neofelis>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 96
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819
X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 01:22:06PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 July 2002 21:23, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > If I say
> >
> > le gerku cu jersi le mlatu
> > <they> cu tatpi binxo
> >
> > What can I use for <they>? I don't think "rera" or "reri" is quite
> > right... "ri .e ra" is a little bit lame, but the only thing I can
> > think of. Are there cmavo for this that I dunno about?
> 
> I recently thought of using "ru", which is quite rarely used (8 vs. 99 for 
> "ra" and 132 for "ri"), for this. By the time one has to refer to something 
> unrecently enough mentioned to be called "ru", one either repeats it or uses 
> a letter or something from the ko'a series.

What's wrong with "la'e di'u"?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/




