From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jul 04 08:44:04 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 4 Jul 2002 15:44:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 42637 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 15:44:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jul 2002 15:44:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 15:44:03 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17Q8m3-0006s8-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:44:03 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17Q8lw-0006rr-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:43:57 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:43:54 z (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17Q8lt-0006ri-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:43:53 -0700 Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g64Fmd377557; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:48:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:48:39 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question Message-ID: <20020704104839.A77512@allusion.net> References: <23.209bfafd.2a55987a@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <23.209bfafd.2a55987a@aol.com>; from pycyn@aol.com on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 08:24:26AM -0400 X-archive-position: 110 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 08:24:26AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > On {remei} as a solution, note also that {remei} refers to a mass and thu= s=20 > would be true if only one of the pair had the property in question. The= =20 > result wanted would require something like {piro le remei cu tatpi}. There's no problem with context resolving the particular things you mentioned in the other email by context; however the above is incorrect. And, note the "le remei" is _not_ a mass. It's a description of something that could go in x1 of remei, treated individually. The place structure of remei is x1 is a set with the pair of members x2 so we're strictly more interested in x2. But because it's a description and because the set contains those members, "le remei" gets ya the same result. --=20 Jordan DeLong fracture@allusion.net --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj0kblYACgkQDrrilS51AZ8vfwCgwDphFQhIjgtRF8ADqN3JP6tU /b4AoNAXmPewv56CwZEsgsHGGHkOr8oE =hX34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--