From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jul 04 15:09:46 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 4 Jul 2002 22:09:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 17245 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2002 22:09:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jul 2002 22:09:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 22:09:46 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17QEnK-0007XK-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:09:46 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17QEnJ-0007X3-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:09:45 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:09:42 z (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17QEnG-0007Wu-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:09:42 -0700
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g64MEbN80643
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:14:37 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:14:37 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Message-ID: <20020704171437.A80614@allusion.net>
References: <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <0207031322060D.02128@neofelis> <5.1.0.14.0.20020704170215.031deb30@pop.east.cox.net> <20020704171221.A80359@allusion.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020704171221.A80359@allusion.net>; from fracture@allusion.net on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 05:12:21PM -0500
X-archive-position: 123
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 05:12:21PM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote:
[ ... ]
> I think re .e ra works, but it's still less desirable than using mei to
> talk about the pair of sumti.

By which I meant "ri .e ra". :)

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj0kyM0ACgkQDrrilS51AZ9jOQCgkJ3e5nD0X+wERJ8zbuPPwneH
QkMAoI3t+uHu1PC2Un4HGWe9kphGTCyM
=3Srj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--

