From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Jul 06 15:07:03 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 6 Jul 2002 22:07:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 78717 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2002 22:07:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Jul 2002 22:07:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2002 22:07:02 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 15:07:02 -0700 Received: from 200.69.2.52 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 22:07:02 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 22:07:02 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2002 22:07:02.0659 (UTC) FILETIME=[75079530:01C22539] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.2.52] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pycyn cusku di'e >If all you mean by your objection is that things like what >gets added (if anything specifiable by places structure) and so on, then, >yes, every predicate probably has its own rules (place structures tend to >be >different), but that hardly seems a reason to say there are no rules. But >it >is a good reason to put those rules in the dictionary. Well, a special rule for every occasion sounds very close to no rules to me. I was not able to write a general rule for the weight case that would apply to a class of properties. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com