From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Jul 08 12:57:19 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 8 Jul 2002 19:57:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 53636 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2002 19:57:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2002 19:57:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.231) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2002 19:57:19 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:57:18 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:57:18 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Just a short story Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 19:57:18 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2002 19:57:18.0956 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA6842C0:01C226B9] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la kir cusku di'e >And {lei vanju} instead of {le vanju} >in the very first line. I would have used {le vanju} instead of {lei vanju} throughout, but in this case they are equivalent. {le vanju} is "each of the quantities of wine that I have in mind", while {lei vanju} is "all the quantities that I have in mind taken together". Since in this case we are talking of one quantity, {le} and {lei} both give the same result, so I use {le} which I feel is less marked. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com