From pycyn@aol.com Thu Jul 11 15:33:49 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 11 Jul 2002 22:33:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 14671 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 22:33:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Jul 2002 22:33:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 22:33:48 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.21.) id r.108.14888574 (18708) for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:33:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <108.14888574.2a5f61c8@aol.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:33:44 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban Re: mei (was Pro-Sumti) In-Reply-To F64iZrAEXCUOGqca... To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_108.14888574.2a5f61c8_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_108.14888574.2a5f61c8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/10/2002 3:28:12 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: << > {le pa le > >pisu'o loi broda} (we can't just tuck the {pa} inside the first {le} > either > >or we get a supermass). > > And that would be {le su'omei be loi broda}, which in this > case can be explicitly singularized to {le paboi su'omei > be loi broda}, avoiding the double selection implied by the > double {le}. > >> {le paboi pisu'o loi broda} also works, avoiding the appearance of a double selection, but still getting the right parse. --part1_108.14888574.2a5f61c8_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/10/2002 3:28:12 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

<<

{le pa le
>pisu'o loi broda} (we can't just tuck the {pa} inside the first {le} either
>or we get a supermass).

And that would be {le su'omei be loi broda}, which in this
case can be explicitly singularized to {le paboi su'omei
be loi broda}, avoiding the double selection implied by the
double {le}.

>>

{le paboi pisu'o loi broda} also works, avoiding the appearance of a double selection, but still getting the right parse. --part1_108.14888574.2a5f61c8_boundary--