From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jul 24 17:06:04 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 36717 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.138) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:06:04 -0700 Received: from 200.69.6.43 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] na'ebo Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2002 00:06:04.0577 (UTC) FILETIME=[11614910:01C2336F] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.43] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la greg cusku di'e >Hi, > >could someone explain why > >{na'ebo le broda} > >is different from > >{le na'e broda} {le na'e broda} is "the non-broda", {na'ebo le broda} is "other than the broda", the difference is pretty much the same as in English. In {na'ebo le broda} you identify something which you describe as a broda, and then you make a claim about something which is simply other than that identified thing. In {le na'e broda} you identify something describing it as a non-broda, there is nothing else described as a broda in this case. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com