From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jul 24 17:27:32 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 25 Jul 2002 00:27:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19440 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 00:27:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jul 2002 00:27:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.167) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 00:27:32 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:27:32 -0700 Received: from 200.69.6.43 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:27:31 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] na'ebo Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:27:31 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2002 00:27:32.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[10D33280:01C23372] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.43] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 > >{na'ebo le broda} > >{le na'e broda} The significant difference between those two comes from the definiteness of {le}, which makes the second definite while the first is indefinite. I wonder whether there's a difference between {na'ebo lo broda} and {lo na'e broda}. Is a dog {na'ebo lo gerku}, on the grounds that it is other than some (other) dog? In that case, {lo na'e broda} would be equivalent to {na'ebo ro broda}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx