From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jul 25 11:22:12 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 25 Jul 2002 18:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 37902 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 18:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jul 2002 18:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 18:22:12 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17XnFc-0004Kg-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:22:12 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17XnFa-0004KP-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:22:10 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17XnFW-0004KG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:22:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:22:06 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other Message-ID: <20020725182206.GB17369@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020725034220.03428e50@pop.east.cox.net> <200207251035.GAA10700@mail2.reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207251035.GAA10700@mail2.reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 295 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 06:23:14AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Robert LeChevalier scripsit: > > > I have tended to reserve my "official" approval, for final products > > that the community as a whole has looked at an also agrees as > > "good". I also like to compliment people for what they have done, > > as I have done tonight regarding some things you have done. > > I think we need to distinguish between official processes and official > products. The stamp "This cuntu is an official LLG process" should be > handed out pretty freely: the President (backed by his board) should > be able to authorize this more or less on the spur of the moment. *Thank* you! > (Of course it can be withdrawn if le se cuntu are going too seriously > off the rails, like creating another language or something.) > > OTOH, "This book/program/website/whatever is an official product of > the LLG" should require a whole lot more review. I think dividing the > issue this way should go a long way to satisfying the seemingly > conflicting needs. I completely agree. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/