From BestATN@aol.com Fri Jul 26 19:30:21 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 45501 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m01.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.4) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 02:30:21 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.21.) id 5.ab.1f96a1fc (3866) for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 22:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 22:30:18 EDT Subject: Klingon orthography of Lojban To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10512 From: BestATN@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1155066 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner --part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2002-07-26 8:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > Has anybody attempted a Klingon orthography for Lojban? ... -- > > Edward Cherlin > edward@webforhumans.com > I don't know if it's been done, but Klingon orthography ('native' pIqaD as well as the 'universally used' romanization) is not suited to any language except Klingon. Its sound system is at odds with Lojban, in particular, which is deliberately fairly symmetrical and comprehensive, while Klingon's is deliberately assymmetrical and full of gaps. Steven Lytle --part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2002-07-26 8:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes:


Has anybody attempted a Klingon orthography for Lojban? ...
--

Edward Cherlin
edward@webforhumans.com

I don't know if it's been done, but Klingon orthography ('native' pIqaD as well as the 'universally used' romanization) is not suited to any language except Klingon.  Its sound system is at odds with Lojban, in particular, which is deliberately fairly symmetrical and comprehensive, while Klingon's is deliberately assymmetrical and full of gaps. 
Steven Lytle --part1_ab.1f96a1fc.2a735fba_boundary--