From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jul 26 22:51:13 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 27 Jul 2002 05:51:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 68304 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 05:51:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2002 05:51:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao01.cox.net) (68.1.17.244) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 05:51:12 -0000 Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20020727055110.YFYY29627.lakemtao01.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org> for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 01:51:10 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020727014554.03757ca0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 01:49:19 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results In-Reply-To: <20020726232241.GH12495@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020725161931.033c2a70@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20020723025544.032cba90@pop.east.cox.net> <4.3.2.7.2.20010730221611.00b10c00@pop.cais.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020723025544.032cba90@pop.east.cox.net> <20020723103956.E28971@miranda.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020723195058.030913c0@pop.east.cox.net> <20020723221537.B26815@miranda.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20020724155616.032ea010@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20020725050104.00aac9d0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20020725161931.033c2a70@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: Robert LeChevalier X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab At 04:22 PM 7/26/02 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Non-local, I think it would take someone with even your intensity > > quite a while to overcome the hump unless it was done by massively > > throwing things out (as in everything from before CLL) and not > > worrying about them (which I considered and rejected, after Cowan > > suggested it). > >Heh. I personally think anything more than 5 years old is irrelevant. >When was the CLL produced? 5 years ago. The main problem is our legacy debts to people who "loaned" balance money before then. I don't expect donors to pay them back, but we still need to keep track of them if and when they want the money back. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org