From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu Aug 01 08:58:18 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 1 Aug 2002 15:58:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 31160 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 15:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Aug 2002 15:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 15:58:18 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17aILC-0001cd-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:58:18 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17aIKX-0001cI-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:57:37 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17aIKS-0001c9-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:57:32 -0700 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g71FvQJ65617 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:57:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:57:25 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Report on LogFest 2002 In-Reply-To: <0H06005RV8G8IM@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> Message-ID: <20020801115648.A65324-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 393 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Edward Cherlin wrote: > On Tuesday 30 July 2002 10:05 pm, Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language > > > > Part of this has always been intended, in that we declared years > > ago that following the 5 year minimum baseline, any debates and > > decisions as to possible changes in the language will take place in > > Lojban-only, and my own opinion is that this part of the transition > > to all-Lojban, in technical management of the language, is more > > important than completely losing English in conducting the everyday > > business of the organization (something we of course cannot do > > completely, since we will still have to use English in dealing with > > outsiders like the government). > > OK, that means that we need a Lojban translation (better, a second > edition) of the Refgrammar, and of some of our favorite reference > works on logic. What do you mean by this? -- Nisha, 26, clutching an ice cream and her toddler son, read impassively through a leaflet calling for immediate dialogue with Pakistan to avert the horror of a nuclear war. "Why should we worry about this?" she said with a shrug. "India has more nuclear weapons than Pakistan. We will wipe them off the map and win the war."