From araizen@newmail.net Fri Aug 02 17:32:47 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 3 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 69425 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.66) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.179] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:32:46 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: LogFest Phone Game results Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7d.2b30bbd9.2a7c46c7@aol.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 611 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "araizen" X-Originating-IP: 172.194.79.100 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=3063669 X-Yahoo-Profile: araizen la pycyn. cusku di'e > The English from 1) wanders way off (but it is not clear what sticking close > would be), but the Lojban 2 follows it pretty well (-mei2 is strictly a set, > not a mass, but why fuss?) except that the relative clause wants to modify > {remei}, not {loi prenu} -- it is the members of the pairs, not of the mass > of people, that can finish eachother's sentences. (probably, each one > individually, {ro jufra} rather than the set all at once -- the ends of sets > can't be said). The original was "lo'e jufra", which is a Llambian archetype, not a set. mu'o mi'e .adam.