From slobin@ice.ru Thu Aug 08 13:49:46 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 8 Aug 2002 20:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 68360 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 20:49:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Aug 2002 20:49:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO party.ice.ru) (193.110.4.62) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 20:49:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by party.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id AAA31680 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 00:49:43 +0400 X-Authentication-Warning: party.lan.ice.ru: slobin owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 00:49:43 +0400 (MSD) X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: [lojban] zo xruti xruti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6806222 X-Yahoo-Profile: slobinru On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jorge Llambias wrote: > 2- agent-xruti is easily recovered from agentless as {xrugau}, > but the opposite is not true. Neither {sezyxru}, nor {xruti vo'a}, > nor any of the variants are very satisfactory. I believe {zi'o xruti} works. But in general I agree with you: agentless version is more often useful. co'o mi'e kir