From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Aug 13 06:32:41 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 65413 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.83) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 06:32:40 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: Tenses Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2002 13:32:40.0752 (UTC) FILETIME=[E598CB00:01C242CD] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pycyn cusku di'e ><< > >A remote axis expression cannot, therefore, go in the > >normal tense place, since it will there attach to the x1 sumti (and >putting > >{cu} before it is illegal). > >I think you may be mislead by the parser here. The remote axis >expression cannot be attached to the x1 sumti just by juxtaposition. >You need {ne} or one of its kin to attach it. > >> >I wouldn't be surprised either way, since I haven't chased it down through >the grammar. But the parser certainly does not treat it like a tense >proper, >grouping it with x1, not with the bridi tail. It is treated like any other term. If you put two sumti in front of the selbri, they are probably grouped by the parser as if one were attached to the other. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com