From pycyn@aol.com Tue Aug 13 07:41:34 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 13 Aug 2002 14:41:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 88830 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 14:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2002 14:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d10.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.42) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 14:41:34 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id r.199.b5ae320 (4584) for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:41:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <199.b5ae320.2a8a7491@aol.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:41:21 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] space tenses To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_199.b5ae320.2a8a7491_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_199.b5ae320.2a8a7491_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/13/2002 8:49:33 AM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: << > za'e} says that the event > takes a medium amount of time. The sumti simply makes that medium > amount of time more precise. >> {ze'a} (I thought I was the only person who did that. But I still do it more regularly.) But is that standard Lojban -- or legal at all? I can't find it and it sounds implausible combining two distance measures, rather than a distance and a focus. --part1_199.b5ae320.2a8a7491_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/13/2002 8:49:33 AM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:

<<
za'e} says that the event
takes a medium amount of time. The sumti simply makes that medium
amount of time more precise.

>>
{ze'a} (I thought I was the only person who did that.  But I still do it more regularly.)
But is that standard Lojban -- or legal at all?  I can't find it and it sounds implausible combining two distance measures, rather than a distance and a focus. --part1_199.b5ae320.2a8a7491_boundary--