Using Manipulatives in Solving and Posing Mathematical Problems

Show more

References

[1] Barnett-Clarke, C., Fisher, W., Marks, R., & Ross, S. (2010). Developing Essential Understanding of Rational Number: Grades 3-5. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

[2] Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational-Number Concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes (pp. 91-126). New York, NY: Academic Press.

[3] Bruner, J. S. (1973). Organization of Early Skilled Action. Child Development, 44, 1-11.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1127671

[4] Burns, M. (2007). About Teaching Mathematics: A K-8 Resource (3rd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

[5] Cass, M., Cates, D., Smith, M., & Jackson, C. (2003). Effects of Manipulative Instruction on Solving Area and Perimeter Problems by Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 112-120.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00067

[6] Clements, D. H. (1999). “Concrete” Manipulatives, Concrete Ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 45.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.7

[7] Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 111-144.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749646

[8] Cramer, K., & Henry, A. (2002). Using Manipulative Models to Build Number Sense for Addition of Fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook (pp. 41-48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

[9] De George, B., & Santoro, M. A. (2004). Manipulatives: A Hands-On Approach to Math. Principal, 84, 2.

[10] Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster (Original Work Published in 1938).

[11] Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual Knowledge Falls through the Cracks: Complexities of Learning to Teach Mathematics for Understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 8-40.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749384

[12] Empson, S. B. (2002). Organizing Diversity in Early Fraction Thinking. In B. Litwiller, & G. Bright (Eds.), Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook (pp. 29-40). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

[13] Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (2002). Teacher Knowledge and Understanding of Students’ Mathematical Learning. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 219-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[14] Fuson, K. C., Kalchman, M., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Mathematical Understanding: An Introduction. In M. S. Donovan, & J. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn Mathematics in the Classroom (pp. 217-256). Washington DC: National Research Council.

[15] Hatfield, M. M., Edwards, N. T., Bitter, G. G., & Morrow, J. (2003). Mathematics Methods for Elementary and Middle School Teachers (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

[16] Hunt, A. W., Nipper, K. L., & Nash, L. E. (2011). Virtual vs. Concrete Manipulatives in Mathematics Teacher Education: Is One Type More Effective than the Other? Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 16, 1-6.

[17] Karshmer, A. I., & Farsi, D. (2008). Manipulatives in the History of Teaching: Fast Forward to Auto Mathic Blocks for the Blind. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (vol. 5105, pp. 915-918). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_137

[18] Kelly, C. A. (2006). Using Manipulatives in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Performance Based Analysis. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3, 184-193.

[19] Marsh, L. G., & Cooke, N. L. (1996). The Effects of Using Manipulatives in Teaching Math Problem Solving to Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 58-65.

[20] Mathematics Science and Technology Education University of Illinois (2011). MSTE Online Resource Catalog.

http://mste.illinois.edu/resources/

[21] McNeil, N. M., & Jarvin, L. (2007). When Theories Don’t Add up: Disentangling the Manipulatives Debate. Theory into Practice, 46, 309-316.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593899

[22] Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori Method (A. E. George, Trans.). New York: Schocken. (Original Work Published in 1912)

[23] Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing Children’s Understanding of the Rational Numbers: A New Model and an Experimental Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 122-147.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749607

[24] Moyer, P. (2001). Are We Having Fun Yet? How Teachers Use Manipulatives to Teach Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175-197.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014596316942

[25] Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What Are Virtual Manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8, 372-377.

[26] Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2011). An Initial Examination of Effect Sizes for Virtual Manipulatives and Other Instructional Treatments. In L. Paditz, & A. Rogerson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project—MEC 21: On Turning Dreams into Reality. Transformations and Paradigm Shifts in Mathematics Education, (Vol. 1, pp. 236-241). Rhodes University, Grahamstown: Oxford University Press.

[27] Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of Virtual Manipulatives on Student Achievement and Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4, 35-50.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103

[28] Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J. J. (2008). Virtual Manipulatives Used by K-8 Teachers for Mathematics Instruction: Considering Mathematical, Cognitive, and Pedagogical Fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 202-218.

[29] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

[30] National Library of Virtual Manipulatives (2010). Interactive Online Math Lessons.

http://enlvm.usu.edu/ma/nav/doc/intro.jsp

[31] Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive Development in Children: Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306

[32] Puchner, L., Taylor, A., O’Donnell, B., & Fick, K. (2008). Teacher Learning and Mathematics Manipulatives: A Collective Case Study about Teacher Use of Manipulatives in Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Lessons. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 313-325.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17844.x

[33] Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., Goldsby, D., Gonzalez y Gonzalez, E., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). Middle Grade Preservice Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 333-354). New York: Springer.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_16

[34] Shodor Education Foundation (2011). Interactivate.

http://www.shodor.org/interactivate/

[35] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

[36] Sowder, J. T., Philipp, R. A., Armstrong, B. E., & Schappelle, B. P. (1998). Middle-Grade Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge and Its Relations to Instruction: A Research Monograph. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

[37] Steen, K., Brooks, D., & Lyon, T. (2006). The Impact of Virtual Manipulatives on First Grade Geometry Instruction and Learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25, 373-391.

[38] Suh, J., Moyer, P. S., & Heo, H. J. (2005). Examining Technology Uses in the Classroom: Developing Fraction Sense Using Virtual Manipulative Concept Tutorials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3, 1-20.

[39] Suzuka, K., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., Bass, H., Lewis, J. M., & Thames, M. K. (2009). Designing and Using Tasks to Teach Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. Scholarly Practices and Inquiry in the Preparation of Mathematics Teachers ATME Monograph, 6, 7-23.

[40] Swan, P., & Marshall, L. (2010). Revisiting Mathematics Manipulative Materials. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15, 13-19.

[41] Uttal, D. H., O’Doherty, K., Newland, R., Hand, L. L., & DeLoache, J. (2009). Dual Representation and the Linking of Concrete and Symbolic Representations. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 156-159.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00097.x

[42] Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn& Bacon/Merill.

[43] von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (supplementary vol., pp. 162-163). Oxford: Pergamon.

[44] Vygotsky, L. (2009). Interaction between Learning and Development. In M. Gauvain, & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the Development of Children (5th ed., pp. 42-48). New York: Worth. (Reprinted from M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (pp. 71-91). 1978, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.)

[45] Zuckman, O., Arida, S., & Resnick, M. (2005). Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-Inspired Manipulatives.

http://guzdial.cc.gatech.edu/hci-seminar/uploads/29/p859-zuckerman.pdf