From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Sat Aug 17 04:38:21 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 17 Aug 2002 11:38:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 68040 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2002 11:38:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Aug 2002 11:38:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO spree.gedas.de) (139.1.44.12) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Aug 2002 11:38:20 -0000 Received: from spree.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00504 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:38:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00494 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:38:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3W810M60>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:38:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: "'lojban@yahoogroups.com'" Subject: Re: [lojban] Phrases for language learners Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:38:14 +0200 Return-Receipt-To: "Newton, Philip" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Newton, Philip" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112 X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton Cyril Slobin wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Newton, Philip wrote: > > > Something like {fanva zoi gy. ___ .gy. la lojban. le glibau > > ma} ? Or is an x1 required? > > I usually use {ko} in x1 of this sentence. As in {ko fanva zoi gy. I love you .gy. la lojban. le glibau ma} ? Having {ko} and {ma} in the same sentence seems strange to me... or perhaps you meant {ko fanva zoi gy. I love you .gy. la lojban.} without the {ma}? I have difficulty imagining a sentence which is simultaneously a command and a question. mu'omi'e filip. [email copies appreciated, since I read the digest] {ko fukpi mrilu .i'o fi mi ki'u le du'u mi te mrilu loi notseljmaji} -- filip.niutyn. All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.