From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Aug 20 07:44:27 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 20 Aug 2002 14:44:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 74959 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2002 14:44:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2002 14:44:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.235)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2002 14:44:26 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:44:26 -0700
Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:44:26 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:44:26 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F235e1fTvOSQeSOzNCW00000266@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Aug 2002 14:44:26.0799 (UTC) FILETIME=[1517ABF0:01C24858]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la pycyn cusku di'e

><<
>So would it be {mi nelci lo'ezu'o citka loi cakla}, then?
> >>
>No, it almost certainly shouldn't be {lo'e zu'o}, though perhaps it is {lo
>zu'o} rather than {le}.
[...]
>If you say {le} at this point, the fair
>question is "which ones are those?" since you have some particular ones in
>mind. So, it is safer to say {lo}, some but unspecified.

If he likes that he is eating chocolate once in his life, he could
say {mi nelci lo zu'o mi citka loi cakla}. Surely he wants
to claim more than that?

>For right now, the crucial thing about intensional contexts (inside the 
>scope
>of abstractions and a few other places) is that you can't quantify out of
>them.

But the problem here is that events, like objects (but unlike
facts probably), should be treated extensionally with le/lo.
So while you have taken care of the quantification over
chocolates, you are still left with a quantification over
events of eating chocolate. We want to refer to such events
intensionally, generically, we don't want a quantifier that
runs over all such events.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


