From slobin@ice.ru Tue Aug 20 16:23:44 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin@ice.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 20 Aug 2002 23:23:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 96764 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2002 23:23:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2002 23:23:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO party.ice.ru) (193.110.4.62) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2002 23:23:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by party.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id DAA04815; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 03:23:25 +0400 X-Authentication-Warning: party.lan.ice.ru: slobin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 03:23:25 +0400 (MSD) X-Sender: To: "Newton, Philip" Cc: "'lojban@yahoogroups.com'" Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6806222 X-Yahoo-Profile: slobinru On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Newton, Philip wrote: > > I would suggest {lo'e} instead of {le}. > zo'o do ba'e roroi stidi zo lo'e As far as I understand xorxean point, he uses {lo'e} as an intensional article. I agree that we need such thing, but I'm not sure {lo'e} does the job. -- Cyril Slobin