From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Wed Aug 21 00:30:45 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 21 Aug 2002 07:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 5624 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2002 07:30:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2002 07:30:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO spree.gedas.de) (139.1.44.12) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2002 07:30:44 -0000 Received: from spree.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA14701 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:30:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA14679 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:30:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:30:07 +0200 Message-ID: To: "'lojban@yahoogroups.com'" Subject: Re: [lojban] I like chocolate Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:30:04 +0200 Return-Receipt-To: "Newton, Philip" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Newton, Philip" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112 X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton la djordyn. cu cusku di'e > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:26AM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote: > [...] > > So would it be {mi nelci lo'ezu'o citka loi cakla}, then? > > .e'u lu mi cakla nelci li'u > And leave it all up to context :) Ah -- the "if in doubt, use a tanru[1]" school! :) Still, it has a certain kind of attractiveness to it. [1] since they are intentionally vague as to what the connection between the component seltau & tertau is mu'omi'e filip. [email copies appreciated, since I read the digest] {ko fukpi mrilu .i'o fi mi ki'u le du'u mi te mrilu loi notseljmaji} -- filip.niutyn. All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.